Sunday, November 25, 2007

NUMBER OF TEACHERS RATED “U” INCREASES UNDER NEW CONTRACT

CHAPTERS' BEST DEFENSE IS FOR MEMBERS TO SUPPORT EACH OTHER

by James Eterno, Chapter Leader, Jamaica High School

The Chief Leader civil service newspaper reported last week that there was a substantial increase in the number of teachers rated unsatisfactory in NYC public schools. In 2006-07 there were 1,333 teachers rated unsatisfactory compared to 981 the previous year. This amounts to a 36% increase in U ratings over the span of just one year.

Of the 1,333 rated U last year, The Chief reported that 918 were tenured up from 662 the year before. This means the increase in tenured teachers rated U is 39% over that same one year period. Also, the number of teachers denied tenure more than doubled last year when compared to the previous year and the amount of teachers who had probation extended increased almost fourfold in 2006-07. While statistical changes over one year are hard to use scientifically, it is fairly clear that the Bloomberg-Klein administration armed for a full school year with a new Contract that severely weakened our rights (no more letter in file grievances, suspension without pay, etc...) is using its punitive provisions to unfairly blame teachers for problems in education. We cannot wait for another increase in U ratings before we fight back assertively.

When the attack on teachers comes to your school, your only defense is to be a strong Union Chapter. Union solidarity has been tried in many ways since Bloomberg and Klein took over control of the schools. In too many schools, the UFT Chapter is now a union in name only. The grassroots level UFT will be tested over and over again in the coming months as Klein's "gotcha" squad of prosecuting attorneys and the data driven accountability system will most likely lead to an acceleration of the unwarranted attacks on educators.

ICE urges all UFT members to aggressively enforce all Contractual rights immediately by filing and supporting grievances as well as taking whatever other actions are possible when the Contract is not adhered to by administration (see the November 19 post on this blog). If we do not stand up for each other and protect what rights we have left, the consequences will be dire. We must stick together by fighting collectively if we are to survive.

If members are in a Chapter where they do not believe they can get support from their Chapter Leader, then they need to form their own groups of UFT members and work together to uphold their collective rights. If anyone needs help, please contact ICE and we will do what we can to assist. If we show the Chancellor, the Mayor and UFT leadership that we are not going to take unwarranted attacks against us lying down, they will have to start to seriously reckon with us.

Don't expect Randi to bail us out. We must begin the counterattack ourselves at the school level and then force the UFT leadership to climb on board.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's the way it goes under the current Contract.

Anonymous said...

I am sure the number of LIFs have increased also. Randi promised to renegotiate if she saw a rise in LIFs, but made no attempt to study the issue.

Anonymous said...

Surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise. When we give up our rights, the DOE goes after us.

Anonymous said...

Is anyone but me outraged about this?

Anonymous said...

So while schools are threatened with closing and their teachers displaced into permanent Sub-dom, the rubber rooms filled to bursting with teachers not informed of the charges against them, and former prosecutors hired to go after others, our union president participates in this hypocritical PR stunt.

The symbolism of Monday evening's non-event at Tweed - isn't a candlelight vigil better suited to a memorial service? a memorial service for seniority and tenure? - followed by the Chancellor's patronizing and dishonest leeter to UFT members, and now this photo op - shows that Randi's sole function, aside from her own political advancement, is to manage the downwardly mobile expectations of the membership and their occasional discontent.

Shame. Shame and disgrace on all of them.

JUSTICE not "just us" said...

I was one of those U rated for the 2006-2007. Of course I didn't deserve it since I am never late or absent and always with a lesson plan in hand. I spoke to Randi in June 0f '07 amnd gave her letter and her advice to me was: "Keep your wits about you and take the pain."

Of course the DOE upheld the U my skunk of a principal gave at my appeal!

This is the "support" I get for my 20years of union dues from the UFT

Anonymous said...

"This means the increase in tenured teachers rated U is 39% over that same one year period."
But this isn't enough for the Chancellor, therefore,he is going to spend one million dollars to raise this percentage. If we don't take action, this number will keep zooming up.

Anonymous said...

Hey Justice-

Have you asked the UFT to take the DOE to court to get your U rating overturned?

Anonymous said...

You are expecting this union to take action? Action comes from us.

Anonymous said...

Hey Jeff, now that you have a site meter up, I'm sure one of the Unity people will have a new job to monitor it daily and of course we will pay for that with our union dues.

JUSTICE not "just us" said...

Justice responds to the person who ask if I asked the UFT to go to court to overturn my U

YES. I GAVE RANDI A LEETER IN HER HAND. I HAVE NO HEARD ANYTHING YET AND I EXPECT A SECOND U DESPITE MY EXAMPLARY RECORD OF NO LATENESSES AND ABSENCES AND ALAWYAS HAVING A LESSON A PLAN.

NOW I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU:
COULD THIS HAPPEN TO YOU?

Anonymous said...

This absolutely could happen to me but you should take the DOE to court now.

Anonymous said...

Where's the outrage over these numbers? It's only on the ice blog.