Dear ________,
We’ve reached a teacher evaluation agreement with the city Department of Education for the 2020-21 school year under which most teachers will receive only one informal observation and members who have already had successful walkthroughs will not need to receive any additional observations at all.
As you know, New York State law requires that teachers be evaluated each year, and the governor declined to issue a waiver like he did last spring. The last thing you need is to be placed under any additional pressure this school year, so we sought to negotiate a evaluation process that is as simple as possible and takes into account this year’s extraordinary working conditions.
A fast and straightforward complaint resolution process has also been established for this school year to protect UFT members if principals don’t follow the correct procedures.
Here are the key highlights of the agreement: |
|
|
- One informal observation will be the default for all teachers who received a final rating of Developing, Effective or Highly Effective or no rating at all in the 2018-19 school year.
- If a walkthrough observation has been completed and the teacher received an Effective or Highly Effective rating, that prior observation can count as their observation. No further observation would be required.
- If a teacher receives a written report with a rating of Developing or Ineffective on the first observation, the teacher will receive a second formal observation with a pre-observation conference.
- Teachers who received an Ineffective or Unsatisfactory rating in the 2018-19 school year will receive one informal and one formal observation.
- All observations must be completed by June 12.
- An initial planning conference is encouraged, but not required unless the teacher received an Ineffective or Unsatisfactory rating in the 2018-19 school year. If a principal chooses to hold initial planning conferences, no paperwork may be involved.
- A summative conference is not required unless the teacher's year-end Measures of Teacher Practice score is Developing or Ineffective.
- Substitute teachers will not be rated according to this evaluation system. Where state law requires a rating for substitutes, they will be rated Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory.
|
|
Only domains in the Danielson Rubric that can be seen or observed in an observation will count in this year’s evaluations. No specific number of domains can be required.
We worked to change the language of 3C - Engaging Students in Learning so it focuses on what the teacher says and does, not what students say or do. Student attendance cannot be a factor. The final language of 3C now says “evaluators should focus on the opportunities teachers are creating to foster student engagement, rather than the number of students with microphones and cameras turned on or off.” |
|
|
Measures of Student Learning |
|
|
A new citywide measure will be the default measure for the MOSL for this school year and will encompass the entire staff under the same MOSL. Extending the MOSL citywide ensures that the process shows our growth as a school system and removes the chance of being penalized for the individual challenges that students and staff are facing this year. But any school that has developed or used its own school-based MOSL in previous school years has the option to continue to use it.
The Biden administration recently declined to extend the blanket waiver on federally mandated standardized tests, but those tests, if they are administered in New York State, will have no bearing on teacher evaluation. |
|
|
A new complaint process for procedural violations |
|
|
Prior to receiving a final rating this school year, teachers who believe they have received an improper or unfair initial rating because of a procedural violation may challenge that rating through a simple, fast process created for this school year only. The APPR appeals process for a final rating remains the same.
Read the full agreement »
Read our FAQ »
If your principal does not follow this agreement, please alert your chapter leader or your district representative.
We know that no teacher evaluation system can ever capture the full scope of the incredible things you accomplish every day or the long hours and hard work you have put in this school year.
Your union is here to support you as always.
Thank you for everything that you do. Stay safe and healthy. |
|
|
|
Well, with friends like these...
ReplyDeleteThey always have your best interest in mind.....
ReplyDeleteWell I admit I set the bar rather low after years of "agreements" and contracts but I don't think this is nearly as bad as people feared.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing I don't like is the citywide MOSL but without (mandated) Regents that would be hard to pull off anyway. Yes it's stupid to include MOSL when you can't give a test (particularly remote teachers) but the State law requires it.
Depending on which poll you read either 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 Americans have said they will not get the vaccine. I’m one of them. Once I heard MSNBC say Trump was rushing the science on the vaccine and Kamala say she didn’t trust it, I made up my mind. No way.
ReplyDeleteJust writing a sincere THANK YOU here to Solidarity for trying to stop this stupidity.
ReplyDeleteThank you Solidarity.
As for the rest...
To my besties Amy, Mike, and now Mary - you're all so great! You really have our backs (w/knife in them) all the time. During the worst year in the history of our lives, you care so much about evaluations. Thank you.
Being told by a non-teaching imbecile that I'm not getting a check-mark in a box on some sheet by other non-teaching imbeciles means the world to me. I'll be a much better teacher thanks to this evaluation system - provided I survive reopening schools and unchecked COVID spread that is.
Another executive order. It'd be democratic if these agreements needed to be ratified by the membership (or even the UNITY controlled DA's).
ReplyDeleteEndangered CL.. agreed. we need democracy in our union.
DeleteEla, math and science regents will be administered.
ReplyDeleteFOR ONNCE MULGOON DID SOMETHING RIGHT!!! In my opinion, the best part of this observation system is that we have the choice to send our admin a video of our lesson. This means no "gotcha" for those who choose this method. I am really hoping that this video option will continue into the future. (Since the "new normal" is to keep social distancing whenever possible, this is an awesome way to achieve this)
ReplyDeleteThere is nothing about remote teaching or evaluations? The agreement, unless I am misreading it, says nothing about remote teaching or remote evaluations. Am I right?
ReplyDeleteThis is for ALL teachers. Because of the wording “what the teacher does,” it can include all aspects of live teaching on the computer. You have to rate teachers under the same rubric or it’s not equitable.
DeleteShelley. I was wondering the same thing.
DeleteMy chapter leader says it’s for all of us. Home and people that are in buildings. Everyone gets the informal and they’re pretty much rating us on how we run the lesson.
DeleteWhere's Carranza going?$$$
ReplyDeletethis evaluation system is for both remote and in person. All for one!
ReplyDeleteIs this that bad? I don’t think so.
ReplyDeleteOne evaluation system for all, but why doesn't the agreement say anything about the fact that teachers are teaching, students are learning online?
ReplyDeleteHow does the UFT sign an agreement that fails to include the context of instruction and evaluation?
Look...the way I see it is if you already had a decent walk through,you are good.no more observations this year.isnt this what we want?why are folks upset?
ReplyDeletebecause they are being evaluated during a time in which no one has any clue what it means to be effective during online instruction? That's my guess anyway hahaha
ReplyDeleteThe drivers ed instructor with no license is evaluating you and gets to decide if you get a driver's license or not.
ReplyDeleteChoose the “record a video of your lesson” option. Would
ReplyDeleteBe nice if we could pick formal. It’s a pain, but it’s not the city’s fault this time. Fault is with the state.
If there's one thing COVID has accomplished, it has exposed the teacher's union for what hard working Americans always knew it was: A SCAM.
ReplyDeleteThe Teacher's Unions are the most un-American group of people in the entire country.
The state, Cuomo is not the problem here. Yes, the state, Cuomo should have waived evaluations this school year, but our union knew that was a battle lost and it has been in negotiations for months, has been involved in the training and planning of this for months, and yet our union failed, again, to negotiate an evaluation agreement that protects or respects the workers.
ReplyDeleteMulgrew was planning and negotiating the evaluation agreement for months. When a resolution to stop virtual, remote Danielson was introduces at the DA, Unity defeated it.
Teaching evaluation is being increasingly used and abused in schools.
While, as I’ve written here previously, there is too much irrational fear of observations, and this weakens us as workers, there is abuse of observations and evaluations by administrators. It is rare (less than 50 teachers each year) that this abuse, the so-called weaponized-Danielson is pushed to a hearing and results in a dismissal for incompetence.
However, the abuse is pervasive in buildings and not only in schools with tyrannical or mad and vindictive administrators. Abuse is ubiquitous in its less acute yet more insidious and damaging form. It is used to weaken teachers, individually and collectively, to force them to bend to pedagogical practices they know are not “best practices” or even possible were they sound and fitting to the educational context and objective.
Furthermore, administrators routinely abuse the observations and evaluation system to coerce teachers to do work without pay. Observations and evaluations are leverage abused by administrators to “increase teacher capacity.”
In our union many chapter leaders are supporting this abuse.
While we can’t win the battle against the state, so we will be observed and evaluated, we can win the battle within our union to stop or at least slow down the attrition of our powers by advocating teacher-led evaluations. We need to take the evaluations out of the hands of administrators.
This pandemic crisis created many opportunities for change. Our union should have stood by the workers and demanded that the teachers, the only people who have enough experience with virtual and remote teaching and learning, conduct observations and evaluations. This could have been a shift in power that would prevent abuse by administrators and strengthen the union and solidarity.
I really hope a ton of teachers choose the video choice for observations so this can stay with us in the next contract.
ReplyDelete2/26 11:23--
ReplyDeleteThe most un_American? Please explain.
At the risk of hyperbole, I would opine that designation cuurently belongs to the traitors who stormed the Capitol carrying Confederate flags, or even those who used the American flag as a weapon, in an effort to undermine a Constitutional election and perhaps even murder the Vice-President.
Regards.
Does your administration email you at inopportune times?
ReplyDeleteRead this article:
www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/e-mail-is-making-us-miserable
10:33 I much prefer to concern myself with traitors who tend to wear all black and chant “defund the police” as they burn, loot and riot the homes and businesses of everyday citizens they also assault but you stick with worrying about the traitors who may have tried to kill useless politicians. I care so little for DC politicians I didn’t bother to fact check your claim. I’m NOT 11:23 btw.
ReplyDeleteRan a failing school. Spent taxpayer money to throw herself a lavish party. She is perfect for the job
ReplyDelete4:11
ReplyDeleteI agree with you about and abhor the violence you describe as well, but I'm surprised an attack on our country's leadership and the desecration of our American instiutions does not upset you because of your feelings toward the members of Congress. Hopefully we also agree that calling a teachers' union the most un-American is shortsighted.
I apologize to all for going off-topic but I couldn't let the union comment stand without reply.
Regards.
-- 10:33
520. On general principal I agree with you regarding desecration etc.... but my contempt for DC politicians is so deep I honestly don’t care if they get torn to pieces. I’ wouldn’t encourage it but if I witnessed it, Id walk away and go about my day not giving DC politicians a second thought. What I expect is that anyone who goes on a violent rampage should suffer serious consequences but since the democrats turned a blind eye to summer violence, Harris even bailing them out, they got what they deserved on January 6th. Lunatics on both sides. Once the first punch is thrown, the initial aggressors shouldn’t bitch when the violence comes for them.
ReplyDelete10:57 RIGHT ON!THE JERKS IN ALBANY CAN DISH IT OUT BUT THEY CAN'T TAKE IT.I WISH THEY HAD GOTTEN THEIR HANDS ON THAT DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDREL PELOSI. IT IS SO AWFUL TO LOOK AT HER PICTURE.SHE JUST WANTS TRUMP'S HEAD ON A FLAGPOLE NO MATTER WHAT.I WISH THEY PUT HER OUT OF BUSINESS!that is a very polite way of expressing my sentiments.wish she had been on a nyc street during the riots.while I never advocate violence,I can see how so many were just fed up to the max. No how about punishing mulgrew?
ReplyDeleteI teach at a High School in Flushing, Queens. We had our Union Meeting today and we were informed that our Principal refuses to count any prior observations or walk-throughs as our observation for the year. Many teachers expressed wanting to use prior observations or walk-throughs from this year to count for their observations, yet he refuses to be flexible and accommodate. We are disappointed by an administration that refuses to accept "a job well done" and place undue stress and pressure on the teachers. Why bother observing if it will never count and your hard work in not recognized? I thought observations were to help you grow as an educator. It seems as of he wants to see us fail instead of acknowledging prior achievement. I will make sure I hold every student accountable and give them the grade they deserve. Not a 65 for attending class once. His letter that stated "understanding our students' situations," does not apply to understanding teachers' situations.
ReplyDeleteAlso, How can we have initial planning conferences without having a finalized rubric.
6:00 Sounds like a classic gotcha principal. Also it could be he/she wants to give out ineffectives so it takes the blame off him/her when the graduation rate and credit accumulation drops. You can't have that and have 100 percent of teachers effective. Your union rep should be more vocal. Your principal sounds like a real prick.
ReplyDeleteTo: March 01, 2021 6:00:00 PM
ReplyDeleteI am so sorry you have a principal that is not willing to work with his staff. I also teach in a Queens High school. Our principal could not be more understanding and is offering his staff the option to receive an observation or to use a prior observation from earlier in the year. Our AP's are also allowing us to choose a date if we choose to be observed. I question his motivation for creating more work for your school's Assistant Principals and stress for his teachers.
What are all these comments regarding "providing a video to your admin" instead of an unannounced visit .
ReplyDeletei.e. Socially distant
I don't see any mention ( except on this board) of any option or even slight possibility
where we can choose the lesson we want to record and send to A.P.
AM I MISSSING SOMETHING ??????????
I should see more people upset with the board of regents who has the real power and makes the real calls. They are a bunch of elitists who sits up north and know nothing about inner-city schools or have no real educational experience to speak of. The NYS CTE board has little to no real cte experience unless you count 3-5 years as any real experience.
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly is an fair, ethical and honest AP going to be looking for? I would think` "ineffective" would be easy to challenge but then again, we're in the UFT.
ReplyDeleteOnly teachers get beat up like this.