This was on twitter:
Resolution to Demand Tier 6 Reforms
Whereas, retirement benefits are not collectively bargained and are in fact tiered, such that two UFT-represented employees with roughly the same amount of experience can have vastly different benefits to look forward to upon retirement.
Whereas, any UFT member who joined the Teachers Retirement System after March 31, 2012 is entered in the Tier 6 pension system; and, have reduced benefits, significantly higher contribution costs, and more severe penalties for early retirement (before the age of 63), compared to members in Tier 4 (who themselves have reduced benefits compared to those in Tier 1), even as many other city agencies such as police, fire, and sanitation can retire with full pensions after 22 years of service.
Whereas, the result of decreased benefits, inflexible retirement age, and increased payment for receipt of said benefits means that Tier 6 members receive less in net compensation than peers in Tier 4.
Whereas the first group of Tier 6 UFT members will soon reach their 10 year mark and thus begin contributing beyond what was expected of their peers in Tier 4, making action on pension reconciliation urgent.
Whereas, in the past the UFT has previously lobbied for pension improvements with some success (e.g. a 25-55 option for Tier 4 members); and Whereas, legislators in New York State are majority Democrats now, but might not always be in the future.
Whereas, lobbying so far has led to a modest improvement, specifically in vesting time, but otherwise has not even come close to making Tier 6 equitable with Tier 4. And, whereas failure to lobby on behalf of our Tier 6 members now to fix its other deficiencies may not only harm our Tier 6 members, but may result in us being forced into a defensive position in coming years if new inferior tiers are introduced for future UFT members.
Be it resolved: the UFT will begin an immediate and aggressive lobbying campaign to the City and the State to improve Tier 6 to at least the level of Tier 4.
Be it resolved: as part of this campaign, the UFT will lobby to create a 25-55 option for Tier 6 members equal to that previously offered to Tier 4 members.
Be it resolved: as part of this campaign, any politician who blocks or intends to block our efforts to fix Tier 6 must at a minimum be barred from receiving COPE dollars, our endorsement, or any other form of UFT support.
Be it resolved: the UFT will also commit to campaigning against any new proposed tiers for future members that have lower benefits than those of currently active tiers.
Resolution on Ending Disproportionate Impact of Discontinuance for High School Probationary Teachers
Whereas, even the most effective probationary teachers can be discontinued or denied tenure for any non-pedagogical reason, including as retaliation for political or union activity.
Whereas, in elementary and middle schools, discontinuance or denial is limited to geographic districts, at least giving teachers of those grades the option to reapply to nearby schools in other adjoining districts.
Whereas, in high schools, discontinuance and denial extends to all high schools in the city, giving high school teachers no option to reapply to high schools in other districts or even other boroughs.
Be it resolved that the UFT will start a multifaceted campaign to convince the DOE and the City to limit the scope of discontinuance or denial of high school teachers to the geographic district in which they teach.
The NYC TRS Board meets 2 times a month at 55 Water St. They have an open public comment period. The meetings are on Youtube
ReplyDeleteI'm actually glad the UFT is not pushing for a mask mandate. Oh yeah, the reason the UFT voted down the resolution to change tier 6 to make it like tier 4 is simple: The UFT simply does not want to put in the work to make that change in Albany. Mulgrew and his cronies are too busy right now in NYC trying to destroy healthcare for retirees AND in-service members.
ReplyDeleteThis came our way earlier.
ReplyDeleteSo I'm the person who asked about eliminating the 155 minutes during town hall last week, and of course got a somewhat BS response (which I appreciate your notes of!).
Let me get this straight; we extended the day because other districts... also have extended days? And somehow extending our day was going to lead to teacher retention, according to Mulgrew? WHAT?!
I just don't know how he can present that logical fallacy with a straight face, and then his caucus can vote AGAINST reforming Tier VI. I say that because I'm currently on Year 10 out of... 41(?!). And I genuinely don't think I'm going to make it another 30 years; it's absolutely insane that any other city/union job would have me working half of my lifetime. Their big accomplishment was an earlier vesting, but if anything, all vesting me earlier did was encourage me more to consider running away from the profession faster.
TL;DR - UFT Leadership really need to understand that working conditions affect teacher retention, and actually listen to members' needs. Otherwise, less people will show up to teach, while more quality teachers will abandon the profession in droves. Spoken as a somewhat average teacher who's strongly consider that second option.