Let's see if ATRs get any justice at the AFT since we are only able to vote and run for elected office for the highest policy-making body of the UFT, the Delegate Assembly, in the schools we happen to be passing through on May 4, 2015 and might know very little about or have moved on from when chapter elections actually take place.
We'll see how President Randi Weingarten responds. A copy of the appeal is below.
ATR's please join us in fighting for union rights.
May 12, 2015
Dear
President Weingarten,
As per
procedures set forth in Article VI, Section 14.(b) of the Constitution of the
American Federation of Teachers, we are asking for you to present to the
the Executive Council an appeal of the Spring 2015 Chapter Elections for the
United Federation of Teachers. Our pre-election complaint concerning
these elections (please see attached) was denied on Monday, May 4, 2015 by a
majority of the UFT Executive Board.
The UFT
is denying a certain class of teachers called Absent Teacher Reserves-Leave
Replacement Teachers-Temporary Provisional Teachers equal rights to have
representatives of our own choosing at the highest policy making body in the
UFT: the Delegate Assembly.
Article
VI, Section 14.(b) of the AFT Constitution states:
“The
executive council may, by a two-thirds vote, authorize the president to appoint
a committee to investigate a local or state federation where an election
appears to have been conducted in violation of the local or state federation
constitution, the AFT Constitution or applicable federal law.”
The
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) in Title I. Bill of
rights of union members in Sec. 101 (a)(1) Equal rights states:
"Every
member of a labor organization shall have equal rights and privileges within
such organization to nominate candidates, to vote in elections or referendums
of the labor organization," rights we are being deprived of because we
belong to no UFT Chapter.
We are
being denied equal voting rights because we hold no regular position in a
school since Absent Teacher Reserves (ATRs) rotate from school to school on a
weekly, biweekly, monthly, term-to-term or yearly basis. Some ATRs will
not be working at the same school when Chapter Elections take place as the
school they were assigned to on May 4, 2015. The UFT arbitrarily decided that
the school ATRs were assigned to on May 4 would be their voting school. Since
Chapter Elections can take place at any point in May or June and ATRs can be
rotated from school to school on a weekly basis and there is no provision for
absentee balloting, some ATRS will be disenfranchised.
Federal
Office of Labor Management Standards regulations also state:
“Every
member in good standing is eligible to be a candidate and to hold office
subject to reasonable qualifications in the union’s constitution and bylaws
that are uniformly imposed.”
It is not
a reasonable qualification for an Absent Teacher Reserve, Leave Replacement
Teacher or Temporary Provisional Teacher to have to run for office in schools
they have no right to a position in when the term of office would begin this
summer. UFT policy has traditionally been to remove people from elected
office when they are no longer a member of a particular chapter. In addition,
while it is possible, it is highly impractical to have members represent
schools they are no longer working at. The procedures put into effect by the
UFT in 2015 put ATRs Leave Replacement and Temporary Provisional teachers at a
huge competitive disadvantage in seeking union office for the Delegate Assembly,
the highest policy-making body in the UFT.
In
essence ATRs have de jure rights on paper that in reality are inferior to the
rights our brothers and sisters who are permanently assigned to schools have.
A
pre-election complaint (see attached) was filed with the United Federation of
Teachers on April 13, 2015 alleging several violations of the
Labor-Management-Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA).
The UFT
responded by appointing Leroy Barr, the UFT Staff Director-Assistant Secretary
to make a report on the matter. Mr. Barr
had previously spoken on the record at the Delegate Assembly against Absent
Teacher Reserves having equal rights to vote and serve in union office.
Mr. Barr had also met with one of us on this issue in November and
clearly was not sympathetic to the cause of ATR voting rights.
Mr. Barr
had a conflict of interest. His lack of
objectivity precluded us from having a fair hearing at the UFT Executive
Board. Instead, a biased hearing was
held on May 4, 2015, where those of us who filed the election complaint were
not permitted to respond to Mr. Barr’s report.
We are
now appealing to the AFT, looking for full election rights for Absent Teacher
Reserves-Leave Replacement-Temporary Provisional teachers. We believe that we
are entitled to our own UFT chapter to represent our unique interests. We trust
we will be hearing from you expeditiously within the next few days, as
elections are now underway.
Sincerely,
James
Eterno
Francesco
Portelos,
Al Zucker
August
Leppelmeier
Absent Teacher
Reserves-Leave Replacement Teachers
C: Monica
Mohan
ICEUFT
Blog
10 comments:
Good luck she created this fiasco
Maybe she will resolve it.
I'd like to remind those who blame Randi Weingarten for "this fiasco" that before her intervention there were no ATRs. We were simply laid off. I spent my first seven years in the then Board of Education being laid off and called back numerous times. I knew the inside of the unemployment office as well as the inside of any school. There's no way to vote for a chapter leader there.
Then LIFO would kick in and the newbies would collect unemployment instead of turning the most experienced, educated and highly paid teachers into subs. I've never heard of anyone being laid off in the 25 years I've been with the DOE. When you were excessed you went to the district office and were placed in the first available position in your licensed area (and I was excessed several times). If they couldn't find anything they placed you out of license for a semester at a time or until you were bumped. This happened frequently until you were appointed. Weingarten is to blame for presenting and misrepresenting the implications of the 2005 contract. I hope you get the brownie points you are looking for.
In the 1995 and 2002 contracts there were no layoff clauses. You can look it up. The ATR clause replaced that.
Who is this disgusting Paula Washington?
thanks for sharing this loose leaf tea australia
Paula is a fine representative of Unity.
Paula you should be ashamed. A liar and a brown nose!
ATRs may hold office as a chapter leader or delegate, just as any other member can. Likewise, ATRs, like all other members, are represented at their schools. To say or imply otherwise is misrepresenting the truth.
Post a Comment