Saturday, April 02, 2022

VOTE UFC TO END UNITY'S SECRET BARGAINING

 91% of UFTers now want open bargaining according to a Facebook group poll. You won't get it unless you vote out Unity-Mulgrew.



23 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Chief Leader article said electronic voting was rejected by a bi-partisan committee.

Anonymous said...

How can you negotiate openly. Then, everything is in the newspaper. The Post gets to tear the mayor apart every day. We'd never get a contract. This just shows how naive UfC is. They're not ready to lead. Vote Mulgrew.

Anonymous said...

UfC.. simplistic answers to intractable problems. Health care costs skyrocket. What's your solution? Strike. You're babies. I'm for Mulgrew.

James Eterno said...

How do Chicago, Denver and LA manage to do open bargaining? It is the trend because members are involved in the process. They have corporate press in those cities too.

James Eterno said...

The answer is single payer healthcare.

James Eterno said...

Unity has a majority on the committee. Karen Alford didn't mention that, did she?

Anonymous said...

Members are more important than the press. This just shows how little you want members involved.

Bennett Fischer said...

11:46:00 - The bi-partisan committee referred to in The Chief is the UFT Election Committee. The committee has thirteen members, 8 from Unity and 5 from UFC. Electronic voting was rejected in an 8-5 party-line vote.

Anonymous said...

Vote the liar Mulgrew out of the UFT presidency.

Secrecy leads to betrayal, fraud and under the table deals,
which is exactly what we have experienced with Mulgrew.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant!

Anonymous said...

Wow, sounds like encouraging people to keep paying dues to that group is a foolish stance. That's an extensive list.

waitingforsupport said...

Vote Mulgrew if you love being treated like an imbecile

waitingforsupport said...

@218pm, move along. I am tired of your song. It's been on replay for over 2 years. Maybe you should try taking your song to another station to find an interested audience.

Anonymous said...

Agree with 2:18. Keep singing as long as you want to.

waitingforsupport said...

Yes. Sing as long as you want. Elsewhere. Lol

Anonymous said...

Sing here. Sing loud.

Anonymous said...

Sing all together now—‘, ‘Do you want to know a secret—do you promise not to tell…’

Anonymous said...

If Mulgrew could be trusted, it might not matter that the negotiations are in secret.

However he has shown himself to be a very, very, very inept negotiator with zero toughness. In fact it looks like New York has something on his background that he has to hide from or perhaps Mulgrew is only trying to ingratiate himself with the Democratic party leadership.

His negotiating has been catastrophically and consistently horrible.
Mulgrew has been a disaster for teachers and for retirees.

Anon2323 said...

Why can't we fight for 20 years guaranteed 40% pension? Instead of enrolling in 25/55 and let's say you do not make that, get a 27% hit to pension. You can legit teach 22 years and instead of having 44% pension you have 17%. Needs to be fixed.

Term limits. Mulgrew should not be even allowed to run.

How sick is this disturbed shit head mayor. First, he continues to mask little toddlers which is beyond child abuse. Now he wants to try and have gay floridians to come to new york because they god forbid they want k-3rd to be taught about sexual identity since that makes perfect sense for them.

Anonymous said...

5:30 - "do you want to know a secret, do you promise not to tell". Damn you're old.

Anonymous said...

It's called a layer of protection not abuse. Don't water down the term abuse. Say you don't like it, that's all you have to do.

Anonymous said...

In Florida, my 1st grade student with two mothers, would not be allowed to discuss his family. This discussion would not talk about sex. It would be a simple discussion about families and how they are different. But god forbid! anyone diverge from the traditional family structure. Here, in NYC, we do not deny the existence of families just because they aren't hetero couples. The best of us educate, with care and concern. You social conservatives just deny and exclude. Or, to use some favorite terms of the reactionary right, you censor and cancel.

Anonymous said...

In Florida, my 1st grade student with two mothers, would not be allowed to discuss his family. This discussion would not talk about sex. It would be a simple discussion about families and how they are different. But god forbid! anyone diverge from the traditional family structure. Here, in NYC, we do not deny the existence of families just because they aren't hetero couples. The best of us educate, with care and concern. You social conservatives just deny and exclude. Or, to use some favorite terms of the reactionary right, you censor and cancel.

Anonymous said...

12:21 - when has Anon2323 ever told the truth about anything. I mean really "beyond child abuse"...it's why no one with any sense takes him serious.